The opposite of this fallacy is the Taboo.
Certain ideologues and religious fundamentalists are proud to use this fallacy as their primary method of ‘reasoning’ and some are even honest enough to say so.Įxample: Since we know there is no such thing as ‘evolution,’ a prime duty of believers is to look for ways to explain away growing evidence, such as is found in DNA, that might suggest otherwise. Wilson, University of Texas El PasoĪ logical fallacy is an irrational argument made through faulty reasoning common enough to be named for the nature of its respective logical failure.Īlso: Rationalization Dogmatism, Proof TextingĪ corrupt argument from logos, starting with a given, pre-set belief, dogma, doctrine, scripture verse, ‘fact’ or conclusion and then searching for any reasonable or reasonable-sounding argument to rationalize, defend or justify it. The name actually comes from the bright-red disclaimer on the prospectus that states that the information in the prospectus may change and is incomplete.Contributed by Owen M.
Given what red herring means, you might think that a red-herring prospectus is designed to mislead the SEC-and investors. A red-herring prospectus is a set of preliminary information that a company submits to the SEC (Security and Exchange Commission), such as before an IPO (initial public offering). (Don’t worry, no spoilers here.)Ī special sense of red herring is used in finance.
Everything from Sherlock Holmes stories to Gone Girl have featured delicious red herrings. In mystery and crime novels, movies, and shows, a red herring specifically refers to a misleading clue, distracting the reader (or a character in the story) from who’s really guilty. That point is a red herring because it isn’t relevant to the discussion about cleaning up after oneself. Then, they point out that you always stay up really late watching TV. Pretend you’re arguing with your roommate about how they never do their dishes. In logic and rhetoric, a red herring is sometimes used to name a type of fallacy where a person brings up an irrelevant point in an argument. He then used this story as an analogy to how he felt the English press was, at that time, spreading false news about the defeat of Napoleon as “a political red herring,” designed to distract people from more important matters at home. In a February 14, 1807, edition of his weekly publication, Political Register, Cobbett told an apparently made-up story about how, when he was boy, they used to drag red herrings on strings to distract dogs sent on hares in their property. What gives? English journalist William Cobbett.Ĭobbett was a vocal critic of England’s government and press. And a 1697 work on horsemanship noted how a red herring could be used to train horses to follow hounds amid the chaos of a hunt.īut these early instances talk about how red herring was used to coach-not confuse-animals.
RED HERRING FALLACY MEME SKIN
In 1599, English writer Thomas Nashe wrote about how the skin of a red herring was used to train hounds to follow a scent.
There is definitely record that red herring were used in hunting. The hounds were supposed to follow the scent of the badger and not be distracted by the red herring, apparently as a way of teaching the dogs to stay focused on their trail-or as a way for escaped criminals to throw off hounds chasing them down. Then, the hunters would introduce the hounds to the scent of another animal, such as a badger. Now, it’s often said that the figurative red herring-referring to a distraction from a matter at hand or a misleading clue-comes from historic uses of the fish to make hounds lose their scent while hunting.Īs one account goes, hunters would drag red herring along the ground to train hounds to follow a scent. This literal sense of the term is old, dating back to the late 1300s. When dried and smoked, they turn a reddish color, hence the name red herring. Herring swim in vast schools and are an important source of food in many cultures. So how did a red herring become an expression for something that throws a detective off their track?
0 kommentar(er)
